Health action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

National Survey Study on the Approaches of Pediatricians, Family Physicians, Medical Oncologists and Gynecologists to the HPV Vaccine

0 comments
Affiliation

Cay State Hospital (Unlu); Akdeniz University (Kalenderoglu, Ay, Kabaoglu, Koc, Erkan); Memorial Antalya Hospital (Gunduz, KircaMustafa Ozdogan); Hacettepe University (Kilickap)

Date
Summary

"...clear and strong communication of physicians about the importance of the vaccine is extremely important for protecting today's young people from HPV-related cancers..."

Despite the high efficacy and safety profile of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, the number of vaccinated individuals is well below the target rate in many countries, including Turkey. This study aims to emphasise the critical role of physician recommendations in increasing HPV vaccination rates, and to create awareness in this regard, by revealing the approach of Turkish oncologists, gynaecologists, paediatricians, and family physicians, who are the primary interlocutors in the matter of HPV vaccination.

Interviews were conducted, and a questionnaire administered, among 425 physicians at 4 separate national oncology, pediatrics, gynaecology, and family medicine congresses in Turkey, between March 10 and March 19 2016. Selected findings:

  • Only 21% of the respondents reported promoting the vaccine in their routine practice.
  • Thirty-three percent of the respondents stated that HPV vaccination was not important, and the ones who considered it to be unnecessary (31%) pointed out its non-cost effectiveness to justify their opinion.
  • Although current guidelines state that the vaccine should be administered to boys as well, only 51% of the respondents believe the vaccine should be administered to both girls and boys.
  • The rate of the respondents who stated that it should be administered to those with a risk factor was only 19%, yet current guidelines state that the vaccine should be routinely administered to everyone of the appropriate age.
  • Respondents who answered correctly the question intended for assessing their knowledge about HPV's share in all types of cancer considered the vaccine to be more important and recommended it more in their routine practices.
  • When the HPV status was evaluated based on branch, the proportion of those who considered the vaccination important was found to be significantly lower in gynaecologists (p < 0.001).
  • Physicians with a lower number of patients per week and those who did not serve in public institutions encouraged the use of vaccine more in their routine practices. Therefore, work intensity is an obstacle to the promotion of the vaccine.
  • The fact that those who have HPV vaccine in the stocks of their workplaces promote the vaccine more often shows that the ability to easily obtain the vaccine is one of the factors affecting the recommendation of the vaccine by physicians.

Among those who did not recommend the vaccination in their daily practices, the rate of correct answer to the question intended for questioning the respondents' knowledge of HPV was found to be significantly lower (p = 0.011). "In other words, physicians recommend the vaccine more often when they are more aware of the importance of HPV. This indicates that training intended for physicians will be a key strategy in increasing HPV vaccination rates....However, there is a need for comprehensive and well-designed studies intended for evaluating the attitudes of nurses, pharmacists and parents of children in the target age group - who are the other interlocutors in the matter of vaccination - towards the HPV vaccine, for determining the strategies that will ensure the vaccination rates to reach the desired levels."

Source

Journal of Oncological Sciences, Volume 4, Issue 2, August 2018, Pages 74-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jons.2018.04.002. Image credit: Nemours Children's Health System