Health action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Parent-Provider Communication of HPV Vaccine Hesitancy

0 comments
Affiliation

UTHealth School of Public Health in San Antonio (Shay); Southern Methodist University (Baldwin); University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Betts, Marks, Higashi, Tiro); UTHealth School of Public Health in Dallas (Betts); Texas Agricultural and Mechanical University (Street); Baylor College of Medicine (Street); g Parkland Health and Hospital System (Persaud); Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center (Tiro)

Date
Summary

"To reduce the burden of preventable HPV-related cancers, it is critical that providers actively engage in effective discourse with HPV vaccine-hesitant parents."

In the context of inadequate levels of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in the United States (US), and the fact that national data reveal that providers are parents' preferred source of vaccine information, this qualitative study analysed actual provider discussions with undecided parents to explore how parents express hesitancy about the HPV vaccine and how providers respond. The goal was to develop a typology that could provide a framework to identify communication drivers of HPV vaccine decisions.

The researchers audio-recorded 43 visits with unvaccinated adolescents aged 11-17 at 6 paediatric clinics in Dallas, Texas, US, in which parents were undecided about HPV vaccination. They qualitatively coded how parents verbally expressed hesitancy (assertive response, asking a question, or expressing concern) and whether providers responded with acquiescence (agree to defer vaccination) and/or persistence (continue discussion). They described the frequency of parent and provider communication codes and same-day vaccination.

Among the 43 visits, 37 parents expressed hesitancy 1 or more times in many ways. Assertive responses were most common (73% of the 37 visits), and they ranged from clear refusals ("no, not right now") to statements that the parent wanted to delay ("we need to think about that"). Parents who expressed hesitancy by asking questions (43% of 37 visits) said things like, "What are the side effects?" or "How is papilloma transmitted in men?" In 12 visits (32% of 37), parents communicated their hesitancy with an expression of concern ("I'm just nervous about it.") When the first expression of hesitancy was a question or concern, 71% and 75% of adolescents, respectively, received same-day vaccinations, whereas 33% of adolescents who received an initial assertive response were vaccinated.

Just over half (n = 19) of adolescents whose parents made 1 or more hesitancy statements received the HPV vaccine during the visit. Nearly three-fourths of parents whose first hesitancy statement was a question or expression of concern went on to have their child vaccinated during the visit. A third of parents who used an assertive response as their first expression of hesitancy went on to have their child vaccinated.

Providers responded with only persistence in 18 visits, a mix of acquiescence and persistence in 13 visits, and only acquiescence in 6 visits. When providers only used persistence, 17 of 18 adolescents were vaccinated; when providers responded with only acquiescence, no adolescents received the vaccine.

"Conversations involving a mix of persistence and acquiescence, by definition, included a back and forth interaction between providers and parents, and thus took somewhat more time than other discussions. However, the length of these vaccine discussions was not appreciably longer than the discussions with acquiescence only. Findings reveal that providers are able to change the mind of hesitant parents and that it does not take much time to educate parents..."

In this exploratory study, providers largely persisted and continued the immunisation discussion in response to parents' hesitancy. The positive influence of provider persistence was evident even among parents who used an assertive style when expressing hesitation (7 out of 7 adolescents were vaccinated). Furthermore, parental hesitancy provides an opportunity to practice patient-centred communication: Unless a provider understands the source of parental hesitancy, his or her response may not be suitably tailored to counter hesitation.

"Thus, parental expressions of vaccine hesitancy may present a critical opening for providers to respectfully engage parents, endorse the HPV vaccine, and address questions or concerns....[The] findings reveal a potentially important missed opportunity when providers simply acquiesce to parental expressions of hesitation."

Source

Pediatrics. 2018;141(6):e20172312. Image credit: AAFP